Vibe coding works until it doesn't. Vague prompts send good agents in the wrong direction. You end up with code that looks finished and breaks under real use.
Tekk.coach is the senior review you never had. Twelve loops read every change to your codebase — Security, Reliability, Payments, Code quality and the rest — and bring you proposals for what to fix. You greenlight them, and your coding agent builds the fix. The code you ship holds up.
Over 7 million developers now use AI coding tools every day. Bad prompts are still the number one reason the output falls short.
[Try Tekk.coach Free →]
How Tekk.coach Does Vibe Coding
Most vibe coding tools are great at generating code. None of them look back at what that code added up to. Tekk does, continuously. It never writes code itself — it reads yours and tells you what needs fixing.
Each loop wakes when your code changes, when Sentry fires, or when part of its area has gone unexamined too long. It reads what changed and follows it to what it touches — the way a senior engineer returning to a codebase does. It doesn't re-audit everything; it picks one method from its shelf of skills and works it end to end.
What it looks for is exactly what vibe-coded apps accrete. The Security loop checks for auth gaps, exposed data, and tenant leaks. Reliability finds the retry that charges twice and the swallowed error. Code quality finds dead code, duplicate helpers, and grab-bag modules. Payments finds the paid signup that provisions nothing. Each run brings at most one proposal, pointing at the code.
You greenlight the proposal or decline it with a reason. Greenlit, it becomes a spec with acceptance criteria, and your coding agent builds it through the Tekk MCP server. "Fix the auth" sends Cursor flailing. A spec that names the route, the missing check, and the criteria for done sends it shipping.
Key Benefits
Your agents get specs, not paragraphs. A one-liner into Cursor is how you get fragile output. Every Tekk spec carries acceptance criteria and a build-order checklist, and a loop's spec points at the files it concerns — derived from your actual codebase, not assembled from generic patterns.
Reads every change, not just the prompt. Loops read what changed and what it feeds into. Every proposal references your real stack. No generic advice, no assumptions about what you're using.
You decide what gets fixed. Every finding is a proposal. Greenlight it or decline it with a reason; declines teach the loops what's noise for your project, so proposals get sharper over time.
Works with the vibe coding apps you're already using. Tekk doesn't replace Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or v0. It reads the repo they build into. Your coding agent — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor — builds what you greenlight, and the merged PR closes the spec. If you want the board and parallel agents in one place, the vibe coding platform is the broader workspace built around the same loops.
Catch what vibe coding misses. You don't have to remember to run a review. The loops wake on every change and read what your agents introduced. As Addy Osmani argues, vibe coding is not the same as AI-assisted engineering — the difference is planning and discipline. Structured ai code review is the quality gate that catches what vibe coding introduces before it reaches production — Tekk's loops keep that gate running.
How It Works
Step 1: Connect — the loops read your codebase. Connect your repo and turn on the loops you want. From your next change on, they read what you've built — your language, your framework, your existing patterns.
Step 2: Wake — on a change, an alert, or a blind spot. A loop wakes when your code changes, when Sentry fires, or when part of its area has gone unexamined too long. It follows the change to what it touches.
Step 3: Propose — one finding, grounded. It works one method from its shelf of skills and brings at most one proposal. Not a recommendation dressed in marketing language — a finding that points at the code. Greenlight it or decline it with a reason.
Step 4: Fix — your coding agent builds the spec.
A greenlit proposal becomes a spec with acceptance criteria. Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex builds it through the Tekk MCP server, and the PR that says Closes TEK-123 closes it on merge. That merge is the next change the loops read.
Who This Is For
Non-technical founders using Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or v0 to build their product. Vibe coding gives you access to development that used to require hiring an engineer. Tekk's loops are the review that engineer would have done.
Solo developers and small teams using Cursor or Claude Code who are tired of the "describe in English, get confused output, iterate eight times" loop. Nobody looks back at what eight iterations left behind. If you're building with vibe coding apps and want to actually ship something solid, Tekk's loops are the missing step.
Also fits product managers who need technically grounded specs without a senior engineer on call, and any team of 1 to 10 people building fast with AI and starting to feel the chaos — specs in chat threads, lost context, code that no one fully understands.
What Are Vibe Coding Tools?
Vibe coding is a development practice where you describe what you want in plain language and an AI generates the corresponding code. The term was coined by Andrej Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, in February 2025 — he described it as a way to "fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists." You express intent, the AI writes code, you iterate. No syntax, no boilerplate. The term went so mainstream it was named Collins Dictionary's Word of the Year for 2025.
The appeal is access. Entrepreneurs, designers, and product managers who couldn't write a line of code can now build software that previously required hiring a developer. AppleInsider reports that App Store review submissions jumped 84% year-over-year in Q1 2026, attributed largely to vibe coding. For existing developers, it's a speed layer. Repetitive scaffolding takes seconds. By 2025 a full ecosystem had emerged: full-stack vibe coding platforms like Lovable and Bolt for non-technical founders, AI code editors like Cursor and Windsurf for developers who want AI inside their workflow. The vibe coding platform category matured separately — tools that manage planning, tracking, and orchestration across the full development lifecycle, not just the generation step.
The problem is input quality. The output of any vibe coding AI is bounded by the prompt you give it. Bad prompts produce bad code, and bad code compounds: security holes, no error handling, brittle logic, unchecked technical debt. An August 2025 survey of 18 CTOs found 16 had experienced production disasters caused by AI-generated code. The New Stack warns that unchecked vibe coding could cause "catastrophic explosions" in 2026. The Stack Overflow blog puts it bluntly: vibe coding without understanding code is a new category of risk. Community consensus has landed: vibe coding without planning is a liability. Tekk's loops are the review most vibe-coded apps never get.