Ship faster without sacrificing quality

Turn your product into self-improving software.

You build the product. Tekk keeps checking everything around it, from security and payments to performance and your AI, and brings you what to fix next. You decide what gets built.

Imagine

Imagine every important part of your product had someone watching it.

Security, payments, performance, your AI, your analytics. Each one checked every time your code changes, by something that knows that area well and tells you the moment it finds something worth fixing.

Imagine… your product could improve itself. AI engineering: it helps you build better AI agents. Code quality: it hunts down AI slop. Security: it finds holes before attackers do. Performance: it finds what slows your app down. Product analytics: it finds out what to track. Observability: it finds what needs an alert. Customer feedback: it turns feedback into what to build next. Then Payments, Reliability, Testing, Backend, React and Alerts. A loop for every part of your product. Just drop in your repo to get started.
The problem

Today, that someone is you. And you're also building the product.

Your coding agent made you faster, but it didn't give you more people. Writing code got cheap. Checking it didn't. The same developer or product manager is still expected to review security, read Sentry, check the analytics, watch performance, test the risky paths and keep the AI's answers good. Nobody has time for all of it, so most of it waits until something breaks.

  • Building the featureyou, today
  • Checking the new route for an ownership checkwhen you remember
  • Making sure a cancel revokes accessafter a refund request
  • Reading the Sentry error nobody alerted onafter a customer emails
  • Finding the query that got slowwhen it's slow
  • Testing the checkout path you just changednext sprint
  • Deciding what to track in the signup funnel"later"
  • Checking whether the AI's answers got worsenever

The bugs that hurt are rarely hard to fix. They're the ones nobody had time to look for.

Twelve loops · one per area

Grow your product, not your headcount.

Tekk gives each of those jobs to a loop, one per area of your product. Each one keeps checking its area as your code changes. You keep one job: deciding what's worth building.

Protect

Security
auth · tenant data · injection
watching…
Payments
signups · cancels · webhooks
watching…
Reliability
timeouts · retries · failures
watching…
Alerts
critical paths · Sentry rules
watching…

Build

Backend
input · races · queries · migrations
watching…
React
state · effects · re-renders
watching…
Testing
changed paths · flaky tests
watching…
Code quality
dead code · duplicates · drift
watching…

Run & grow

Performance
latency · queries · spend
watching…
Observability
silent jobs · untraced paths
watching…
AI engineering
prompts · retrieval · evals · cost
watching…
Product analytics
funnel · tracking plan
watching…

Switch on the ones you want. Every loop and its methods: the twelve loops and their skills.

How it works · in plain words

What self-improving software means.

Your product keeps getting better between releases, because something is always checking it and every fix feeds the next check. Every loop runs the same cycle in the background, following what changed to everything it touches, the way a senior engineer would.

01 WAKE
Something changed
Your code · Sentry · an area nobody checked lately
02 READ
Reads the change
And everything it touches
03 SKILL
Works one method
From its shelf of skills
04 PROPOSE
Brings you one proposal
Or an honest "nothing found"
05 YOU DECIDE
Greenlight or decline
A decline, with a reason, teaches the next run
06 BUILD
Your coding agent builds it
The PR that says Closes TEK-123 closes the spec
Then it loops.
That merge is the next change the loops read.
Claude Code Codex Cursor Gemini CLI Copilot Windsurf

Specs reach your agent through the Tekk MCP server and close when the pull request merges. A spec is just markdown, so any agent that can read it can build it.

What it doesn't mean: Tekk never writes, commits or deploys code. Nothing in your product changes without your greenlight.

What you get

Every finding comes with the fix written out.

Not "something looks wrong in auth". A loop tells you what it noticed, what to change, which files, and how you'll know it's done. Your coding agent can build from it as written. That's how you ship fast and keep the quality bar.

Upgrade retrieval to hybrid search + rerankingAI engineering loop
What it noticed
Plain vector search misses results users expect. Answers are weak on multi-term queries.
What we're building
Hybrid search (keyword + vector) with a reranking pass before the model sees results.
Acceptance criteria
  • Recall@10 beats the current setup on the eval set
  • Reranking adds under 150ms at p95
  • Falls back to vector-only if the reranker errors
Out of scope
Re-embedding old docs, query rewriting, graph RAG
Files
src/agent/retrieval.ts · src/db/search.ts

Say yes and it goes on your board, next to the work you plan yourself. When the pull request merges, it moves to done on its own.

app.tekk.coach
Tekk.coach board — goals above, specs in todo / in-progress / done columns
Who it's for

Built for the person doing ten jobs.

missing: a security + payments review

Solo founder

Get the review you can't hire for yet, on every change, before a customer finds the bug.

missing: time to check their own code

Developer

Stay in your coding agent. Specs reach it through MCP with the acceptance criteria already written.

missing: a board that tells the truth

Product manager

See what actually shipped. A spec closes when its pull request merges, not when someone remembers to move the card.

Ship faster. Keep the quality bar.

Connect your repo, switch on the loops you want, and wake up to proposals worth reviewing.