Vibe coding without a platform is chaos with a fast clock. App Store submissions jumped 84% year-over-year in Q1 2026, driven almost entirely by vibe coding tools. Specs live in chat threads. Agents execute on conflicting assumptions. You're shipping fast and losing control of what you've built.
Tekk.coach is the vibe coding platform that puts structure around the whole workflow. Twelve loops read what changed in your code and propose specs you greenlight. Your AI agents build them through the Tekk MCP server, and a Kanban board tracks every spec until the merge closes it.
This is what adopting vibe coding at a platform level actually looks like: one board for what to build, what's in progress, and what merged — fed by loops, worked by your agents. Not scattered markdown files and chat history.
[Try Tekk.coach Free →]
How Tekk.coach Works as a Vibe Coding Platform
Most vibe coding tools handle the generation step. Tekk sits around it: before generation, loops decide what's worth building; after it, they read what your agents produced. Tekk never writes code itself — it keeps the board your agents work from.
Twelve loops watch your repository — Security, Reliability, Backend, Payments, Performance, Testing, React, Code quality, AI engineering, Observability, Alerts, and Product analytics. Each wakes when your code changes, when Sentry fires, or when part of its area has gone unexamined too long. It reads what changed and follows it to what it touches. This is what makes it a platform and not a tool: every spec is grounded in your actual code, not generic boilerplate.
A loop that finds something real brings you one proposal, pointing at the files it concerns. You greenlight it or decline it with a reason; declines teach the loops what's noise for your project. Greenlit, it becomes a spec: what to build, why, acceptance criteria, and a build-order checklist. You can still write specs by hand.
That spec lives on a Kanban card: todo, in progress, completed. When you're ready, your coding agent — Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor — picks it up through the Tekk MCP server, alone or in a collision-free batch of parallel sessions. The PR that says Closes TEK-123 completes the spec when it merges, and that merge is the next change the loops read.
What you get is not a better prompt tool. It's self-improving software: the loop closes on every merge.
Key Benefits
Codebase-grounded specs, every time. Loops read your actual repo before proposing anything. Every proposal points at your real stack, your real files, your real patterns — not generic architectural assumptions that break when they hit your code.
Done is defined before any agent writes a line. Every spec carries acceptance criteria and a build-order checklist. A merge only completes it when the checklist agrees. That's how you stop scope drift from compounding into months of rework and technical debt.
One workspace for everything you're building. Kanban board, loop proposals, linked pull requests — all connected. No more specs in chat threads, tasks in Notion, and status updates in Slack. If it's in your backlog, it's in Tekk, with a spec behind it.
Loops read what your agents shipped. Every merge is a change the loops read. This matters because one in five vibe-coded apps ships with serious vulnerabilities or configuration errors. The Security loop audits like an attacker, the Reliability loop looks for the retry that charges twice, and each brings you what to fix — grounded in your actual codebase, not generic checklists.
Parallel agents, live today. Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor connect through the Tekk MCP server. Specs declare the code they touch and what they depend on, so your agent can plan a collision-free batch and open a session per spec. Each spec closes from its own merged PR. Bring your existing agents — Tekk gives them the board.
How It Works
Step 1: Connect your repo. Connect your repository and turn on the loops you want. This is the foundation everything else is built on. The loops start on your next change.
Step 2: A loop brings a proposal. A loop wakes on a code change, a Sentry alert, or an area gone stale. It reads what changed, follows it to what it touches, and brings at most one proposal — or records an honest "nothing found" instead of inventing work.
Step 3: Greenlight or decline. Greenlight the proposal and it becomes a spec. Decline it with a reason and the loops learn what's noise for your project. Want something no loop raised? Write the spec by hand. You stay in control of every decision.
Step 4: Get a structured spec. Not a chat message. What to build, why, acceptance criteria, and a build-order checklist, plus the code it touches and the specs it depends on. This is the document your coding agents actually need to execute correctly.
Step 5: Manage it on the Kanban board.
The spec lives on a card. Your coding agent builds it through MCP and marks it in progress; the PR that says Closes TEK-123 moves it to completed when it merges. Each card shows the pull requests that built it — no lost context, no starting over.
Who This Is For
Non-technical founders running their entire product through vibe coding. According to J.P. Morgan, 63% of active vibe coding users are now non-developers — product managers and founders building full-stack apps with natural language alone. You can get code generated — but you can't evaluate whether that code is architecturally sound, secure, or maintainable. Tekk's loops read every change your agents make and bring you what they missed, explained, as proposals you greenlight or decline.
Solo developers and small teams using Cursor or Claude Code. You've felt the chaos: specs in chat windows, agents executing on stale context, rework because the intent wasn't clear. Even Inc. reports that non-technical founders who skip structured planning end up rebuilding what their agents shipped. Tekk ends that. One board, specs written from your code, and a backlog you can actually manage.
Teams of 2 to 5 people coordinating multiple agents. You're splitting work across Cursor for implementation, Claude Code for complex logic, and Gemini for UI specs. Without a platform coordinating that, you get conflicts, duplicate work, and lost context. Tekk's board plus its MCP server is built for exactly this: specs that declare their code areas, and batches that don't collide.
What Is a Vibe Coding Platform?
A vibe coding platform manages the full lifecycle of AI-assisted development — from planning through execution, tracking, and review — not just the code generation step. This is a meaningful distinction from a vibe coding tool.
Vibe coding itself was coined by Andrej Karpathy in February 2025: you express intent in natural language, an AI generates code, you iterate. The practice exploded in 2025. By early 2026, 92% of US developers use AI coding tools daily and 21% of Y Combinator's Winter 2025 cohort have codebases that are over 90% AI-generated. The tools — Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, Emergent — are mature, well-funded, and widely adopted across technical and non-technical builders alike.
The problem is that generation is only one step. Without planning, vibe coding produces insecure, unmaintainable code at speed. Security researchers scanning 5,600 vibe-coded applications found over 2,000 vulnerabilities and 400+ exposed secrets, and separate analysis shows AI-generated code carries 2.74x more security vulnerabilities than hand-written code and 1.7x more major bugs. The software engineering community — including ICSE 2026, Microsoft's Azure AI team, and GitLab — has converged on the same conclusion: structured planning before generation is the professional standard. Adopting spec driven development as a baseline is how platforms enforce that standard. A vibe coding platform provides that structure, plus the workflow layer to track, manage, and coordinate what gets built.
Tekk.coach is a vibe coding platform in this sense. Generation tools like Cursor and Lovable are excellent at writing code. Tekk is what points them at the right code — loops that read your actual codebase, specs you greenlight, and a merge that closes each one.