AI Agent Orchestration
Run multiple AI coding agents on the same codebase. All merging to one PR.
That's where this is going. Here's what's real today, and why the planning layer is the thing most people skip.
Today: Tekk generates the spec that makes multi-agent execution work. Every plan comes out with subtasks decomposed by dependency, file references baked in, scope defined. The spec is already an orchestration plan — before the orchestration layer even ships.
Coming next: Tekk dispatches those subtasks to Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini via OAuth. Parallel execution waves. One shared feature branch. One PR at the end. Real-time kanban tracking while each agent does its job.
How Tekk.coach does AI agent orchestration
Part A: what's live today
Every feature you plan in Tekk comes out as a structured spec. Not a chat message. Not a paragraph you paste into Cursor and hope for the best.
The agent reads your codebase before asking a single question. It searches your files, maps your dependencies, understands your architecture. Then it writes a plan with:
- Subtasks ordered by dependency — the execution sequence is built in
- File references per subtask — each agent knows exactly which files to touch
- Acceptance criteria per subtask — behavioral definitions, not vague descriptions
- A "Not Building" section — a hard scope boundary so agents don't wander
That structure isn't accidental. It's designed so a coding orchestrator can read the plan and dispatch correctly, without ambiguity. The spec is the orchestration plan.
You can use these specs with your agents right now. Connect your repo, generate a plan, hand it to Cursor or Claude Code. The output quality difference is immediate.
Part B: what's coming next
Tekk will close the loop on execution.
When you approve a plan, Tekk takes over:
- Analyzes the subtask dependency graph
- Groups independent subtasks into parallel execution waves
- Batches related subtasks (shared files, shared context) into coherent jobs per agent
- Dispatches to Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, or Gemini via OAuth
- All agents push to a single shared feature branch
- One PR when the last job completes
- Real-time progress on your kanban board — 3 of 5 jobs done
You watch it ship instead of driving it yourself.
Key benefits
Tekk's plans map subtask dependencies automatically. You know which tasks can run in parallel before you dispatch a single agent. No manual decomposition, no dependency spreadsheets. (Live today.)
Independent subtasks get flagged. Dependent subtasks get sequenced. The plan tells you what can run simultaneously and what has to wait — your agents don't step on each other. (Live today.)
All agents push to the same feature branch. One PR to review. No branch juggling, no manual merges across four separate worktrees. (Coming next.)
Your kanban shows what's planned, in progress, and done across all your features today. When the execution layer ships, each card will show live agent progress: which jobs are running, which finished, which need your attention. (Live for planning. Coming next for execution.)
How it works
Step 1 — Connect your repo. GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. Takes two minutes.
Step 2 — Describe the feature. One sentence or a paragraph. Tekk asks clarifying questions grounded in what it found in your code — not the generic questions you'd get from a blank chat window.
Step 3 — Review options (when there's a real architectural choice) Two or three approaches with honest tradeoffs. Pick one, or skip it if the path is obvious.
Step 4 — Get the spec (live today) A complete, structured plan streams into the editor in real time. Subtasks with dependencies, file references, acceptance criteria, scope boundaries. This is the document your team works from.
Step 5 — Edit and approve. The spec is a living document. Change anything before you proceed.
Step 6 — Execute (coming next) Tekk dispatches to your agents via OAuth. Parallel waves run. You watch the kanban.
Step 7 — Review and merge (coming next) One PR. Review it on GitHub. Merge it. The card auto-completes.
Who this is for
Developers already running Cursor and Claude Code on the same project, burning mental energy on context management and merge conflicts — Tekk's planning layer cuts that overhead today. The orchestration layer eliminates it.
Teams who can see the parallelism opportunity in their work but can't easily act on it. Tekk's dependency mapping makes it concrete. You know what can run simultaneously before you start.
Solo founders who want to run a team of agents. One person with four agents in parallel is a real engineering team. The bottleneck is planning and coordination, not the agents themselves. That's what Tekk removes.
Anyone whose agents keep building the wrong thing. Most coding agent failures trace back to a vague spec. If you've typed "add authentication to my app" into Cursor and gotten output that didn't fit your architecture, that's not an agent problem. It's a spec problem. Tekk fixes it at the source.
What is AI agent orchestration?
In software development, AI agent orchestration means coordinating multiple coding agents so they work in parallel on the same codebase without overwriting each other, and merging their output into one result.
A single coding agent — Cursor, Claude Code, Codex — is sequential by default. You give it a task, it runs, you wait, you review, you give it the next one. Orchestration breaks that bottleneck. Independent subtasks run simultaneously. A feature that would take one agent an hour might take four agents fifteen minutes.
The constraint in AI-assisted development has shifted. It's no longer how fast an agent writes code. It's whether the task decomposition going into that agent is any good. Most orchestration failures come down to a bad input spec — vague subtasks, unmapped dependencies, missing file context. Google's 2025 DORA Report found that higher AI adoption correlated with a 9% increase in bug rates and 154% increase in PR size. Agents aren't the problem. The specs they run on are.
The current landscape includes developer frameworks — LangGraph, CrewAI, the OpenAI Agents SDK — for building orchestration systems from scratch, and coding-specific tools like Composio's Agent Orchestrator for managing agent fleets. Most of them share the same assumption: you arrive with a well-decomposed task structure. That assumption is the gap.
Tekk attacks it differently. The spec Tekk generates — subtasks by dependency, file references baked in, scope defined hard — is exactly what a coding orchestrator needs to dispatch correctly. Tekk produces that spec from your actual codebase. No other tool in this space does that.
Start building
The orchestration dispatch layer is coming. The planning layer — codebase-aware specs with dependency mapping built in — is live right now.
Connect your repo. Describe what you're building. Get a spec that's ready for agents.