Your codebase is accumulating structural debt you can't see. AI coding agents are shipping code that works at the function level and breaks architectural principles at the system level. You need a tool that reviews the whole system — not just the diff.
Tekk.coach reads your complete repository, runs an architecture review grounded in your actual code and current best practices, and tells you what to fix before it compounds. No instrumentation. No enterprise rollout. Connect your repo and go.
How Tekk.coach Does AI Code Architecture Review
Tekk's review mode reads your entire repository before producing a single recommendation. Not the PR diff. Not a description you paste in. The actual source code — semantic search via embeddings, file search, regex search, directory browsing, and repository profiling. Languages, frameworks, services, package dependencies. The full structural picture.
Then it searches the web for current best practices specific to your stack. If your dependency injection pattern is outdated, your service boundaries don't reflect 2026 microservices thinking, or your auth implementation has a known vulnerability pattern, Tekk flags it. Recommendations are benchmarked against current external standards, not just internal consistency.
The output is specific. "Your auth service has a circular dependency on the user service through a shared repository layer — here's the restructure" is the kind of finding you get. Not "consider applying clean architecture principles." Tekk names files, names patterns, and tells you what to do.
After the review, you switch directly into planning mode. The same codebase understanding that powered the review powers the spec generation. Architecture review finding → structured plan to fix it → execute with your coding agents. One workflow, one session.
Key Benefits
Reads the full system, not just what changed Architectural problems don't live in diffs — they live in the relationships between files, services, and modules that haven't changed in months. Tekk reads the complete repository. That's how it catches the structural issues that PR-level tools miss.
Benchmarked against current best practices Tekk searches the web during review. Recommendations reference what's architecturally correct now, for your specific stack — not patterns from three years ago. You get a senior architect who keeps current, not one who learned everything in 2021.
Specific findings, not checklists Every recommendation names specific files, patterns, and the exact structural problem. You know exactly what's wrong and where it lives. No interpretation required before you can act on it.
Four review types from one codebase connection Architecture review, security review, performance review, agent improvement review. One repo connection. One tool. You don't need separate integrations for each type of structural concern.
Zero setup overhead GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket OAuth. Read access. No instrumentation, no deployment changes, no weeks-long implementation project. The architecture review tool that's running in minutes, not months.
How It Works
Step 1: Connect your repository Link your repo via OAuth. Tekk reads your codebase — GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. No agents to install, no runtime hooks, no changes to your deployment.
Step 2: Request an architecture review "Do an architecture review." "Check my service boundaries." "Review my data layer." Plain language. The agent runs semantic search and repository profiling before forming any opinion about your architecture.
Step 3: Receive specific findings Tekk produces architectural findings specific to your codebase: the structural issue, the location (files and patterns), and the recommended fix. Web research runs during the review to ensure recommendations reflect current best practice.
Step 4: Plan the remediation From the same session, describe the architectural change you want to make. Tekk generates a structured plan: subtasks with acceptance criteria, file references, dependency ordering, and explicit scope boundaries. The same codebase context flows from review to plan.
Step 5: Execute with your coding agents Hand the plan to Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex. Your agents have exact instructions: which files to touch, what behavior to implement, what acceptance criteria to meet. The architecture fix lands correctly.
Who This Is For
Solo developers who've been shipping fast without architecture review You're using Cursor or Claude Code and you know the codebase needs a structural look before you build the next layer. You don't have a senior architect. Tekk is the architecture review you'd otherwise skip until something breaks.
Small teams (1-10 people) without a dedicated architect Features are getting built. Nobody is watching the structural layer. Dependency cycles and coupling problems are accumulating invisibly. Tekk provides the architectural oversight that a dedicated architect would give — on demand, without adding headcount.
Developers working outside their expertise You're building a data pipeline, an AI agent infrastructure, or a payments integration. You can make it work, but you're unsure if the architectural choices are sound. Tekk reads your implementation and benchmarks it against current best practice — without you needing to become a domain specialist.
Tech leads before a major feature build You want to validate the current architectural foundation before adding significant complexity. Tekk surfaces the structural issues that would compound under the new load before any new code is written.
What Is an AI Architecture Review Tool?
An AI architecture review tool applies artificial intelligence to evaluate software system design — identifying structural anti-patterns, dependency violations, layer boundary crossings, and security concerns at the architectural level. The focus is system structure, not individual functions. This is different from code style tools (linters) and PR-level code review tools — those see what changed; architecture review sees how the system is designed.
Traditional architecture review is a manual, synchronous process: a senior engineer or architect reads diagrams and code and issues recommendations. AI architecture review tools automate or augment this at scale, reading codebases programmatically and applying pattern recognition across an entire repository.
The demand has sharpened since AI coding agents became mainstream. Agents like Cursor and Codex generate correct function-level code without architectural awareness — they can't see how a change affects the broader system. PRs are growing approximately 18% larger as AI adoption increases, and change failure rates are rising. Architecture review tools are the structural quality gate that AI-assisted development needs to not degrade over time.
Ready to Try Tekk.coach?
Run an architecture review on your codebase today. If you've been shipping with AI coding agents without a structural quality gate, Tekk will find what's accumulating before it becomes expensive.